Criminal Defense Attorney

Client Info SheetClient Info Sheet

Free Case Evaluation

Protect your rights, Explore your options. Fill in the form for a free consultation!

Kyle Lowe, Criminal Defense Attorney

Kyle Lowe Criminal Defense/DWI Attorney

Licensed to practice law since 1993 in New Mexico, and since 1997 in Texas, Kyle Lowe has been trying cases for 16 years. His only focus is Criminal Law. Beginning his career as an Assistant District Attorney in New Mexico, Kyle quickly worked his way up to Deputy District Attorney and became the designated DWI Prosecutor for the office.


In his 5 years as a prosecutor Kyle tried more than 60 cases to juries to include the first State prosecuted wiretap conspiracy case in New Mexico history...



Posts Tagged ‘field sobriety tests’

And yet another DWI Acquittal for Austin DWI Attorney, Kyle Lowe

January 5th, 2011 by Kyle Lowe

Austin DWI Attorney, Kyle Lowe continued his streak of DWI acquittals on November 17th when a Williamson County jury acquitted his client of  DWI 2nd Offense.  A jury was impaneled on November 15th, 2010 in Williamson County Court of Law #2, Honorable Tim Wright presiding.  The case was prosecuted by the Chief of that court.

The facts of the case are as follows:  Client was stopped for speeding on RM 1431 near IH35 by a DPS Trooper.  The Trooper testified that said client was exceeding the speed limit by 15 mph at approximately 1:30 am.  The Trooper continued by stating the client believed she was traveling at 55 mph and when asked, she honestly did not know the exact time of day without looking at her watch.  The Trooper then stated that the client admitted having 2 beers within several hours, had slurred speech, exhibited ‘marked’ sway, unsteady gait and, after a HGN test (eye exam), showed intoxication.  The Trooper concluded his testimony by stating that the client constructively refused any other field sobriety and breath tests.  Upon cross examination by Kyle Lowe, the Trooper softened his statements regarding the client’s intoxication by stating that her speech was ‘only slightly slurred’ and that her ‘sway was not visible on the video’ due to the distance from the camera to the parties.  Further cross examination of the Trooper revealed that his HGN exam of her eyes was not in compliance with the standards set forth by the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) and that much of the evidence he used was not visible on camera.  The Trooper also revealed that the client’s ‘excited and emotional responses’ in the vehicle during transport to the county jail were ‘not unusual’ for DWI defendants who begin to realize that detention/incarceration is imminent.

The jury did not believe there was sufficient evidence to convict and unanimously acquitted the client of DWI, 2nd Offense.

Austin DWI Attorney, Kyle Lowe, back on track with another DWI Acquittal

December 21st, 2010 by Kyle Lowe

After June brought a guilty verdict, Austin DWI Defense Attorney, Kyle Lowe restarted his win streak with another DWI acquittal in August.  His client was acquitted in Travis County Court of Law #7, Honorable Elisabeth Earle presiding.  Client was originally arrested for DWI in Travis County following a stop for Speeding on 6th Street.  Austin Police Department officers testified that from their stationary position near Whole Foods Market at 6th and Lamar, they clocked said client going 40 mph in a 30 mph zone.  The police officers went on to testify the following additional indicators of intoxication:  when stopped, a request was made for the client’s TX Drivers License at which time the client handed them a credit card; the officers reported that the client had low, thick-tongued speech, was slow to respond to questions, admitted drinking at least 3 beers and did not know the exact time of day.  During the field sobriety tests, officers testified that the client had 4 of 6 indicators on the HGN eye test, could not keep his balance while being instructed to do the walk and turn test, then, while performing the walk and turn, he missed the heel to toe motions, took 8 steps instead of the instructed 9 and turned incorrectly.  Further evidence offered by the officers was that the client had a delayed estimation of time during the Rhomberg balance test and, while performing the one-leg stand test, he swayed, used his arms for balance and put his foot down one time.

Under cross-examination, the Austin police officers revealed that they were conflicted as to whether the speed limit in the area the client was clocked was actually 30 or 35 mph.  Further testimony revealed that since it was actually a 35 mph zone that the client was clocked in, the officers would not have stopped someone unless they were exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles.  Additional cross examination led one of the officers to state that, although he was sure the client was driving while intoxicated, since the client exhibited only 4 of the 6 indicators on the HGN, there was a strong possibility that the client could have been below the .08 standard for intoxication as set forth by the NHTSA.  Further cross examination of the officer revealed that the client as well as many others who are not ultimately arrested for DWI walk 8 steps instead of 9 on the walk and turn portion of the testing.  Additionally, the officer testified that the client did fairly well on the walk and turn test as well as the one-leg stand.  Upon further questioning, one of the officers became noticeably frustrated with the questioning by Kyle Lowe.  The officer began turning red-faced with anger and became verbally aggressive and evasive while on the stand.  Following the officer’s testimony, the client then took the witness stand as did the client’s friend who had witnessed said client’s drinking that evening.  Following this testimony, the defense rested.

After 3 hours of deliberation and two and a half days of testimony, the jury returned a unanimous verdict of NOT GUILTY.

Austin DWI Attorney, Kyle Lowe, snags third DWI acquittal in a row

December 13th, 2010 by Kyle Lowe

Austin DWI Attorney, Kyle Lowe, secured his third Travis County DWI acquittal in a row.  Moments before jury selection in County Court at Law #8, Honorable Carlos Barerra’s courtroom, a Travis County prosecutor offered a reduction of charges to Mr. Lowe’s client.  The offer on the table was to plea to Obstruction of a Passageway; the client rejected the offer.  Following jury selection, two Austin police officers took the witness stand and alleged the following indicators of intoxication: that Mr. Lowe’s client failed to signal a lane change on Congress Ave. at 12:15 a.m.; that said client admitted to drinking 1-2 beers; that said client engaged in excessive movement and had slurred, thick-tongued speech during field sobriety testing, and that he demonstrated 4 of 6 indicators on the HGN (eye test).  Additional observations during testing were: that said client swayed and used his arms to balance himself on the one-leg stand, that the client failed to touch heel to toe during the walk and turn portion of the test, stopped while walking,  took the wrong number of steps, and then awkwardly turned around.  During the final test, one of the officers testified that said client was to stand with his feet together, close his eyes, tilt his head backwards, and estimate the passage of 30 seconds.  The testimony was that the client was off by 10 seconds.  At the conclusion of the field testing, said client was arrested for DWI, whereupon he refused the breath test and claimed on video that he did not understand the statutory warning the APD officer read to him prior to the request for a breath specimen.  Upon cross-examination, both APD officers revealed that the HGN eye test must be performed exactly as the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) requires and that further, since Mr. Lowe’s client was facing the lights of oncoming traffic, his eyes could have shown false indicators of intoxication due to the strobe effect of passing headlights.  After further cross-examination, the APD officers also acknowledged that said client’s mistakes on the walk and turn test were not overly significant and that Mr. Lowe’s client held his foot up for 31 seconds, a time which exceeded the maximum due to the client’s slow counting.  Mr. Lowe’s client did not take the stand; the jury deliberated for an hour and a half and returned a verdict of Not Guilty of DWI.